Close your eyes, click your heels three times, and
tell me if you actually know what is happening in Syria.
There’s an awful lot about the poison gas attack that doesn’t
add up for the casual observer.
It was only a week ago that the US enunciated a new policy
that we would be content for Bashar al Assad to remain in power presiding over
the Syrian government — after years of grousing and threats against him.
Apparently Trump Central had concluded that Assad was a better alternative than
another failed state in the Middle East with no government at all.
That policy change was a yuge benefit for Assad since
it removed any pretext for US subterfuge or “black box” mischief against him.
He was rather busy fighting a civil war, after all. Against whom? A mash-up of
Jihadi forces ranging from Isis (so-called), to al Qaeda and Jabhat al Nusra,
its spinoff gang dedicated specifically against Assad personally. Assad’s
relations with Isis were ambiguous and complex. Isis had used Syria as a
staging area for its operations next door in Iraq. It was rumored that Assad
purchased oil from Isis. Yet Isis had participated in actions against Assad. In
any case, all of the Jihadis were Sunni, in opposition to Assad’s Iran-leaning
regime. Assad himself belongs to the Alawite sect of Islam, a twig on the Shia
branch. Syria as a whole is a majority Sunni population, so Assad and his
father Hafez before him (President 1971 – 2000) have represented a minority (12
percent) in an era of inflamed Sunni-Shia passions.
